John Hall's Baby's Analogy and Theory

John Hall's Baby's Analogy and Theory

Copyright © 2023 John Edward Hall

Today is Saturday 11th February 2023.

Time is 20:29 CT.

XJ Corps.

Part 1 - "Baby": Brief Description.

Baby rules are non-sensical however present the illusion of importance or function; This is not surprising, babies are dependent on a 'parent', or provider of function, however they themselves are dysfunctional independent of instruction or 'forced survival'; In this case, survival of a baby is the stuff that does not kill it, or IT does not kill itself; "Toys", those are granted from a 'parent' can drastically enhance a baby's intelligence, however the function of a baby, as stated without parental guidance, the baby is inherently dysfunctional and the opposite of 'god-like'; In the essence of the baby without "TOYS" ("tools"), there is selfishness and susceptibility to forces outside of its control; for instance, if a THIEF were to instruct the baby extraneous to the parent's house-code, the baby WILL without doubt succumb to foreign force, and this is not even persuasion at this level; however with "TOYS" that can enhance the intelligence of the baby, dysfunction is not lost: the toy does NOT take away natural 'evil' of the baby or its desire to "control every person around it to become itself"; A baby is a design of something like a animalistic dictator, or even something that can not have a soul (a moral compass); It begs the question of the fallacy of natural-order or that the baby is a humorously dark and gross idea intelligently designed as a whim of the creator; 

Even babies react to the extent of the threat of thier domain; SURVIVAL is the quelling of the threat, or any party seeking to retract "TOYS" or 'affection' (Fred): within the babys SUPER-AUTOMATED REACTION SYSTEM, as it is programmed, it will incarnate JEALOUSSY, it will react expidientyl with the resource it has, either as a dim unit through its own right or "arms", CRYING, or with enhanced power to the next level or BABY 'WARFARE', using the toy as a weapon.. As stated, it is observed that babies attempt with vein or selfish intuition to replicate themselves into others or at least conquer others into being itself: THE BABY IS FAT (or what we call "baby-fat"), the baby wants everyone to be fat, without parental guidance it will attempt to convert EVERYONE AROUND IT, as long as it has the power and 'land' to convert, without discipline, IT WILL ATTEMPT TO CONVERT THROUGH ANY MEANS POSSIBLE. Dissidents of 'depostist-like' baby power will especially be the attraction of the baby itself; this remains, and it is not a very stupid consequence nor a difficult one to face, as a baby is easy to distract and circumvent; If the baby is successful at converting, there will be babies and THEY WILL ALL HAVE THE SAME 'BABY-MIND'.. The question remains, how is anyone pursuaded into being as like-minded as a baby (babies)..?

Part 2 - Baby Competition: Enter, The DOG (Pet Not).

The Dog, as a competetor and threat to baby-self-replication without 'parental block', is NOT the baby; it is practically everything the baby is not: is has libido, sexual desire to copulate with its female owner, is the male head parent's best friend, adn does have a higher intelligence than the baby, and even acts unselfishly and can act independent of the heads of the household: a baby cannot do these things however WITHOUT A THOUGH recognizes, this is "STATIC WALL", that an obstacle seeming abstract is a physical block for the SURVIVAL of the baby; The baby wages war against the Dog. The baby is super-jealous and of course, it will not under any circumstance give way to the faltering of its plan for total convert; this however is not possible, as the DOG is really a different being, even as it was concieved.

Part 3 - Baby gets DICK, baby is GAY.

The baby is highly susceptible to force; If the baby gets the force of dick, it is gay. Like before, if the baby is gay, it will attempt to make everyone around it gay also. It is refutable that the only thing that can possibly be "gay" is baby.

Part 4 - A baby does not teach itself: a baby only copies.

A baby is not a teacher, and it is NOT a student. It acts as machine, it has no soul; It cannot geniuinely be aware of its animation, nor does it choose anything without being programmed to or behave outside of design; A baby can copy whatever it sees although this does not mean it understands its behavior, however it is easy to see, a babies behavior as a mimicker is only motivated through its dependent nature and EXTREME JEALOUSY. This is something cool, at least a baby has a posistive trait to mimmick anything that is thrown in front of it, 'robotically', and in what it does mimick it becomes with 'parental guidance'. A baby is a soldier for the force of the parent, in this way, whatever the baby 'outputs' or 'produces' through behavior is the result of the parent or resource that was SOVEREING to it. What is forced, or imprint, onto a baby, is what the baby uses for its incarnate and inherent selfish desire; this can be like an inner 'demon', and the baby is an unaware piece of a game (baby), a pawn of the parent.

Part X -  Additional Types of Babies: Outliers or hypotheticals.

1. Nominal Baby.

2. The Parent Baby: the baby is the parent.

.   .   .

This is the end of my theory, baby (baby).

-John.